It's Anyone's Game: What China's Five-Year Plan Means for Quantum Computing -- Barrons.com

Dow Jones
Apr 15

By Mackenzie Tatananni

Plenty can be achieved in five years, provided there is enough ambition.

In the world of quantum computing, five years hardly seems like enough time to address the hurdles impeding the development of scalable, practically useful systems. However, China aims to make quantum computers widely available by 2030.

In mid-March, China unveiled its bold new vision for the coming half decade: its 15th Five-Year Plan, which mentions quantum computing in its pledge to "nurture industries of the future."

The goal here is clear. In addition to fostering greater self-reliance, China is looking to beat out other nations in the race to develop and commercialize the nascent technology. For now, it's early enough that it is anyone's game.

The U.K. committed around $2.5 billion in March to scale quantum computers by the start of the next decade. Similar efforts have been underway in the U.S. since 2018, when the National Quantum Initiative passed with near-unanimous support, pledging core government funding of $1.3 billion over five years.

However, those figures are overshadowed by Beijing's level of investment. Jefferies analysts noted last month that China outstripped all other countries with around $15 billion in funding announced before 2023. This level of interest appears to be helping the country make significant inroads in quantum computing.

China accounted for 60% of all quantum patent applications as of 2024, though a smaller share actually were granted. While there's no guarantee patents will translate to commercial technology, they're nonetheless a way to attract investment and establish a competitive advantage.

There's a fundamental difference to the way Beijing approaches quantum, Jefferies analysts pointed out. The U.S. quantum ecosystem spans dozens of companies, research organizations, and start-ups, and government involvement has typically centered on funding and validation "rather than selecting national champions."

China approaches quantum "as a top-down strategic priority," analysts said. The Five-Year Plan designates quantum as one of seven frontier technologies, with coordinated commercialization efforts focused on a smaller set of institutions. Estimates suggest roughly $16 billion of state support, roughly four times that of U.S. public investment to date.

The U.S. does outpace China in private sector funding. With McKinsey attributing two-thirds of quantum start-up investments to private sector funding in 2024, that's fairly significant. The European Centre for International Political Economy, a global think tank, noted that the U.S. led in investment in the quantum private sector in 2024, at 44% of global funding.

In 2026 alone, three quantum companies have entered the public market in the U.S. following a lull in 2025, while others have been gearing up to make their trading debut. One highly anticipated prospect, Quantinuum, is set to be carved out from Honeywell later this year.

Pasqal, a French start-up, is another one to watch. CEO Wasiq Bokhari told Barron's its upcoming Nasdaq listing will be an important first step for the company to become truly global and get access to the capital it needs to pursue that goal. "These are the premier markets. I think everybody knows that," Bokhari said.

Other CEOs have expressed similar sentiment. IonQ CEO Niccolo de Masi lauded the "the animal spirits of quantum," which he said are only possible in a free market like the U.S. "We're in favor of capital markets functioning on the side of investors taking risks," de Masi told Barron's. "I don't think these companies get funded anywhere else in the world."

So just how real is the threat to U.S. quantum companies? "It's a huge black box sometimes," Xanadu Quantum Technologies CEO Christian Weedbrook said in an interview last month. Xanadu went public at the end of March.

"Historically China has been further ahead in the quantum security side of things," Weedbrook said. This is true -- Jefferies analysts rank China ahead of the U.S. in post-quantum cryptography and communication.

Although broad commercialization is a highly awaited milestone, this point shouldn't go overlooked. Jefferies analysts asserted that quantum should be viewed as a national security asset, adding that "drivers, funders and applications will inevitably be heavily government-influenced" in both the U.S. and in China.

At the company level, "I think it's driving people to not want to fall behind even though they don't know how far behind they are," Weedbrook said. It remains to be seen whether the Five-Year Plan will make things clearer.

Write to Mackenzie Tatananni at mackenzie.tatananni@barrons.com

This content was created by Barron's, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. Barron's is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

April 14, 2026 13:16 ET (17:16 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10