Objective Fell 64% And The Case For It Still Did Not Fully Break

Simply Wall St.

14 hours ago

The year’s defining headline for Objective Corporation was blunt. After more than 25 years, the Australian Department of Defence chose not to renew the firm’s long running ECM support agreement, and ...

Source Link

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

{"basename":"","ssrTDKData":{"titleTemplate":"%s - Tiger Brokers","title":"Tiger Brokers | Global Stocks, Options & Futures Trading App","description":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","keywords":"tiger brokers,tiger trade,tiger brokers singapore,broker online,stock trading in singapore,share trading singapore,brokerage firm singapore,trading app,stock broker singapore,stock trading platforms,trading account","social":{"ogDescription":"Tiger Brokers, one-stop investment in US stocks, SGX stocks, HK stocks, A-shares & other global assets. One of the best stock trading platforms in Singapore.","ogImage":"https://c1.itigergrowtha.com/portal5/static/media/og-logo.0a0bd8dc.png","ogUrl":"https://www.itiger.com/news/2672607837"},"companyName":"Tiger Brokers"},"pageData":{"isMobile":false,"isTiger":false,"isTTM":true,"region":"SGP","license":"TBSG","edition":"fundamental"},"isCrawlerRequest":true,"__swrFallback__":{"@#url:\"https://stock-news.skytigris.cn/v3/news\",params:#id:\"2672607837\",edition:\"fundamental\",auth_exemption:1,,,undefined,":{"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2672607837?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","thumbnail":"https://simplywall.st/cdn-cgi/image/fit=cover,format=auto,width=320,height=180/https://images.simplywall.st/asset/industry/8041000-choice2-card/1788941901517","is_english":true,"pubTime":"2026-10-02 03:22","share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","id":"2672607837","market":"us","top_or_hot":-1,"title":"Objective Fell 64% And The Case For It Still Did Not Fully Break","media":"Simply Wall St.","content":"<div>\n<p>The year’s defining headline for Objective Corporation was blunt. After more than 25 years, the Australian Department of Defence chose not to renew the firm’s long running ECM support agreement, and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://simplywall.st/stocks/au/software/asx-ocl/objective-shares/news/objective-fell-64-and-the-case-for-it-still-did-not-fully-br\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"simplywall_highlight","html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Objective Fell 64% And The Case For It Still Did Not Fully Break</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nObjective Fell 64% And The Case For It Still Did Not Fully Break\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2026-10-02 03:22 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://simplywall.st/stocks/au/software/asx-ocl/objective-shares/news/objective-fell-64-and-the-case-for-it-still-did-not-fully-br><strong>Simply Wall St.</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The year’s defining headline for Objective Corporation was blunt. After more than 25 years, the Australian Department of Defence chose not to renew the firm’s long running ECM support agreement, and ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://simplywall.st/stocks/au/software/asx-ocl/objective-shares/news/objective-fell-64-and-the-case-for-it-still-did-not-fully-br\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","isBrief":false,"type":0,"news_type":1,"symbol":"OCL.AU","symbol_name":"OBJECTIVE CORPORATION LIMITED","start_time":0,"source_url":"https://simplywall.st/stocks/au/software/asx-ocl/objective-shares/news/objective-fell-64-and-the-case-for-it-still-did-not-fully-br","article_id":"2672607837","we_media_id":null,"thumbnails":["https://simplywall.st/cdn-cgi/image/fit=cover,format=auto,width=320,height=180/https://images.simplywall.st/asset/industry/8041000-choice2-card/1788941901517"],"rights":{"source":"simplywall_highlight","url":"https://simplywall.st/stocks/au/software/asx-ocl/objective-shares/news/objective-fell-64-and-the-case-for-it-still-did-not-fully-br","rn_cache_url":null,"directOrigin":true},"url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2672607837","pubTimestamp":1790882536,"columns":[],"sourceInfo":{"source_id":"simplywall_highlight","name":"Simply Wall St."},"weMediaInfo":null,"summary":"The year’s defining headline for Objective Corporation was blunt. After more than 25 years, the Australian Department of Defence chose not to renew the firm’s long running ECM support agreement, and the stock later suffered a sharp fall that shocked many holders. Investors who held Objective from the start of the year are down 63.6%, including dividends. If you were weighing up a position back on 1 January, what did the early information really suggest about this outcome risk?\nObjective is...","collect":0,"end_time":0,"defaultTopTitle":"simplywall.st","property":[],"viewcount":null,"language":"en","relate_stocks":{"OCL.AU":"OBJECTIVE CORPORATION LIMITED","BK7016":"应用软件"},"translate_title":"Objective 下跌 64%，但其情况仍未完全打破","themeId":null,"isJumpTheme":false,"ttsUrl":null,"symbols_score_info":{"OCL.AU":1},"content_text":"The year’s defining headline for Objective Corporation was blunt. After more than 25 years, the Australian Department of Defence chose not to renew the firm’s long running ECM support agreement, and the stock later suffered a sharp fall that shocked many holders. Investors who held Objective from the start of the year are down 63.6%, including dividends. If you were weighing up a position back on 1 January, what did the early information really suggest about this outcome risk? Objective is not the only name tied to this theme. Zero in on 90 AI infrastructure stocks and compare how each one is priced. AdvertisementThe Argument You Would Have Been Weighing Up On Objective Corporation The shares cost A$16.51 at the start of the period, and anyone researching Objective Corporation then had to decide which of two very different stories felt more convincing. On the bullish side, the “Digital Gatekeeper” narrative implied a Fair Value of A$17.68, essentially the price suggested by its assumptions about the future. That view leaned on revenue growth of 9.1% and a profit margin of 28.7%, plus a future P/E of 53.3x over a 5 year horizon. The bearish script pointed to a Fair Value of A$7, with the key concern that increased regulation, economic fragility and dependence on government contracts could weaken revenue stability, earnings growth and margins. ASX:OCL Trailing 12-Month Earnings & Revenue History as at Oct 2026 What The Objective Corporation Results Actually Tested The key development was Defence deciding not to renew Objective Corporation’s long running ECM Upgrade and Support Program agreement, which directly challenged the bullish assumption of highly durable government contracts. Reported H2 2026 figures showed revenue at A$67.982m and net income at A$18.486m, with net margin at 27.2%, lower than the earlier 29.6%. Overall, the evidence cut both ways. The live assumption this tested was contract durability. For any similar software group, it is important to track concentration in long term government deals, and to compare that with shifts in Annual Recurring Revenue and reported net margin over time. What You Would Be Paying For In Objective Corporation Today Objective Corporation now trades at A$5.82, leaving holders from the start of the year down 63.6%. The selected bullish Narrative still places its Fair Value above that level, based on the idea that government workflows remain tightly wired into Objective’s software. For that higher figure to be reached, a buyer today would need confidence that long term public sector contracts stay sticky enough to support resilient subscription revenue and profits. \"Objective Corporation is the plumbing behind modern government in Australia, New Zealand, and increasingly the United Kingdom. When a regulator issues a licence, when a council approves a development application, when a department publishes policy, Objective's software is probably running underneath.\" That disagreement has a full argument behind it. → Uncover the higher Fair Value this Narrative argues for Before The Next Story Makes Headlines The next headline does not have to be where your research begins. Go straight to the companies and see whether a contrarian opportunity could be taking shape.  Company 1 - 22% below our estimate - expands production capacity following integration while directing capital to exploration activity. Company 2 - 38% below our estimate - develops a multi-affiliate structure that channels managed assets into recurring fee revenue. Company 3 - 25% below our estimate - expands pharmacy footprint and product range as prescription and GLP-1 medicine demand rises.  That is three of the list. See the full list of 4 companies trading below our estimate →  This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data\n        and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your\n        financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data.\n        Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.\n        Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.New: AI Stock Screener & AlertsOur new AI Stock Screener scans the market every day to uncover opportunities.• Dividend Powerhouses (3%+ Yield)• Undervalued Small Caps with Insider Buying• High growth Tech and AI CompaniesOr build your own from over 50 metrics.Explore Now for FreeHave feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com","kind":"highlight","is_publish_news":true,"is_publish_highlight":false,"is_publish_live":false,"is_publish_wemedia":false,"editions":null,"column":"","sentiment":"-1","news_tag":"","news_rank":0,"isVideo":false,"video":null,"symbols":[],"gpt_button":0,"need_auth":false,"need_login_tip":false,"code":"91000000","status":"200"}}}